The play of King Lear is one of William Shakespears great tragic pieces, it is not only seen as a tragedy in itself, but also a play that includes two tragic heroes and four villains. I felt that a tragic hero must not be all good or all bad, but just by misfortune he is deprived of something very valuable to him by error of judgment. We must be able to identify ourselves with the tragic hero if he is to inspire fear, for we must feel that what happens to him could happen to us.
Aristotle stated a tragedy must be a drama about persons and things of some importance, where the highly placed hero is brought low through the combination of his or her own faults the "tragic flaw" and external forces.
The situation must be capable of being generalized, and it should induce pity and fear in the viewers. Finally, the drama must end with the attainment Yes, King Lear does fit Aristotle's definition of a tragic hero.
Finally, the drama must end with the attainment of understanding, bringing about a katharsis or "purging" that resolves the pity and fear the audience feels. King Lear is a highly placed individual, and his proposal to retire from the cares of state is an affair of some importance.
His "tragic flaw," the inability to distinguish between sincere and false devotion, is a common fault among people in general, and so audiences easily feel pity and fear when he falls victim to flattery and is ruthlessly betrayed by those he should have been able to trust the most.
Finally, Lear approaches a state of understanding at the end of the play, when he realizes though too late that Cordelia was in fact the only one of his daughters to be true to him, and for the whole of his life he has been ignorant of the true nature of his role as a king and his own devotion to earthly vanity: Come, let's away to prison: We two alone will sing like birds i' the cage: When thou dost ask me blessing, I'll kneel down, And ask of thee forgiveness: Act V, Scene 3 Even though the play ends with the deaths of both Lear and Cordelia, these lines show that before his death, Lear had reached the complete comprehension anagnorisisthe understanding and acceptance of how he truly fits into the scheme of things, which tragedy demands.King Lear - Analyzing a Tragic Hero, Free Study Guides and book notes including comprehensive chapter analysis, complete summary analysis, author biography information, character profiles, theme analysis, metaphor analysis, and top ten quotes on classic literature.
In this play, the tragic hero is undoubtedly the title character, King Lear. The plot is driven by the power and consequence of losses, more specifically, the losses of Lear.
In the course the play, King Lear, because of his flaws, loses his authority as a king, his identity as a father, and his sanity as a man.
King Lear is one of the most complex plays written by William Shakespeare, with its many characters, disguises, and surprising outcomes. Typical of most Shakespearean tragedies, old King Lear is brought to ruin, and eventually death, by a tragic flaw: his foolishness spurred on by his pride.
King Lear is a tragic hero because he is a man that is very arrogant and does not se the world for what it really is. The things that made Lear a tragic hero are his nobleness, arrogance (tragic flaw), and a reversal of fortune.
As a King, Lear’s lack of knowledge in decision making occurred due to the effect of his arrogance and the quality. - King Lear: Lear The Tragic Hero The definition of tragedy in the Oxford dictionary is, "drama of elevated theme and diction and with unhappy ending; sad event, serious accident, calamity." However, the application of this terminology in Shakespearean Tragedy is more expressive.
WHAT IS A TRAGIC HERO? Thesis KING LEAR: THE TRAGIC HERO By: Jolene, Phurwa, Jenny and Julian A tragic hero is a character that experiences misfortunes due to their fatal flaw Through Aristotle's five stages, King Lear's life transforms from good to bad fortune due to his tragic flaw.